<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: [CES 2008] Samsung 650 Series LCD TV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.funponsel.com/blog/electronics/ces-2008-samsung-650-series-lcd-tv.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.funponsel.com/blog/electronics/ces-2008-samsung-650-series-lcd-tv.html</link>
	<description>Daily Gadgets, Computer, and Electronics News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:08:39 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.funponsel.com/blog/electronics/ces-2008-samsung-650-series-lcd-tv.html/comment-page-1#comment-719158</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 07:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.funponsel.com/blog/archives/2008/01/08/ces-2008-samsung-650-series-lcd-tv/#comment-719158</guid>
		<description>After having 5 series 46&quot; for a while a I got my 6 series 3 weeks ago and I am so far happy with it. Sound is alright when connecting to a proper equipped &quot;home cinema system&quot;. Compared before Sony, Philipps,
LG and Samsung in the range of 46&quot; and I have clearly to say that Samsung is the only one which has most of the issues (100 hz, Full HD, good picture etc. etc.)
a normal TV viewer will require. The price is very much alright for the product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After having 5 series 46&#8243; for a while a I got my 6 series 3 weeks ago and I am so far happy with it. Sound is alright when connecting to a proper equipped &#8220;home cinema system&#8221;. Compared before Sony, Philipps,<br />
LG and Samsung in the range of 46&#8243; and I have clearly to say that Samsung is the only one which has most of the issues (100 hz, Full HD, good picture etc. etc.)<br />
a normal TV viewer will require. The price is very much alright for the product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simple89</title>
		<link>http://www.funponsel.com/blog/electronics/ces-2008-samsung-650-series-lcd-tv.html/comment-page-1#comment-539075</link>
		<dc:creator>simple89</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 05:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.funponsel.com/blog/archives/2008/01/08/ces-2008-samsung-650-series-lcd-tv/#comment-539075</guid>
		<description>This LCD is the best. Period. The picture and color are amazing. Samsungs sure do make top quality product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This LCD is the best. Period. The picture and color are amazing. Samsungs sure do make top quality product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael dobey</title>
		<link>http://www.funponsel.com/blog/electronics/ces-2008-samsung-650-series-lcd-tv.html/comment-page-1#comment-519855</link>
		<dc:creator>michael dobey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 23:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.funponsel.com/blog/archives/2008/01/08/ces-2008-samsung-650-series-lcd-tv/#comment-519855</guid>
		<description>THis series does have a better picture than even the sony xbr series.  However they didn&#039;t seem to design it for x.v. color or deep color.  the two upcoming standards.  And when you call samsung they seem clueless about these ,  strangely their blu ray player supports these standards.  so it&#039;s crazy that they didn&#039;t put this into their lcd series.    However the price of a new z-series sony lcd. 
or a xbr which has these features is six hundred dollars more than the 650 series.  however the sonys will do 24p true picture rate for movies and the samsungs don&#039;t really do it.  Once again this is on their blu ray player but not the tv&#039;s ,  this is a case of the two departments not talking to each other most likely.    So the buyer is face with getting a great tv now but it won&#039;t support the deep color standard that may be big in 2 years or less.  or maybe not.  how imporatant are these standards?  who knows?  does samsung have deep color?  they have wide color whatever that means.  still 1,800 compared to 2,400 for a z series on sale is 600.00 saved.  It&#039;s too bad sony can&#039;t price their tv&#039;s more reasonably.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THis series does have a better picture than even the sony xbr series.  However they didn&#8217;t seem to design it for x.v. color or deep color.  the two upcoming standards.  And when you call samsung they seem clueless about these ,  strangely their blu ray player supports these standards.  so it&#8217;s crazy that they didn&#8217;t put this into their lcd series.    However the price of a new z-series sony lcd.<br />
or a xbr which has these features is six hundred dollars more than the 650 series.  however the sonys will do 24p true picture rate for movies and the samsungs don&#8217;t really do it.  Once again this is on their blu ray player but not the tv&#8217;s ,  this is a case of the two departments not talking to each other most likely.    So the buyer is face with getting a great tv now but it won&#8217;t support the deep color standard that may be big in 2 years or less.  or maybe not.  how imporatant are these standards?  who knows?  does samsung have deep color?  they have wide color whatever that means.  still 1,800 compared to 2,400 for a z series on sale is 600.00 saved.  It&#8217;s too bad sony can&#8217;t price their tv&#8217;s more reasonably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
